Standardizing disinfectant wipes across multiple facilities requires comparing active ingredients, kill claims, and dwell times.
With over 300 facilities in one health care system, how does an infection preventionist (IP) narrow down the many options for disinfectant wipes while keeping both health care workers and the medical equipment safe?
Maria Montero, MPH, MT(ASCP)SM, CIC, FAPIC, IP, Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital, researched this topic for her health care system and spoke to Infection Control Today® (ICT®) about the study for which she was lead author, “Standarizing Disinfectant Wipes Across a Hospital Setting" recently published in the American Journal of Infection Control. Montero discusses how she and her team reduced the number of types of wipes used in the facilities they studied, the future research she has planned, and what needs to be updated and corrected concerning disinfection wipes in the 11 hospitals and over 300 ambulatory sites she and her colleagues studied.
“The importance [of the study] was to make sure that clinical staff were using cleaning and disinfecting surfaces and medical equipment appropriately, correctly following the correct contact times using the appropriate disinfectant wipes,” Montero told ICT® in the exclusive interview. “When we started this, there was a mixture of different types of wipes different chemicals. It was very difficult when we asked staff, “How do you clean this piece of equipment?” for them to remember the appropriate dwell time for each wipe that they used. We found this very important to standardize our disinfectant wipes across the system. When COVID-19 came, the pandemic enforced the importance of doing this because we started having difficulty securing disinfecting wipes.”
Another key point that Montero made was the safety and efficacy of the wipes used on the various equipment in the many facilities she and her team studied. In order to find the safest and most efficient wipe, she told ICT®, “We partnered with our vendor, and we shared the top 10 pieces of equipment that we used across the system, and they did a crosswalk in [to verify the wipes were safe]."
Montero said that for some of the wipes, the equipment or wipes were so new that there was no documentation yet to verify their efficacy or safety. However, “the vendor was instrumental in helping us with determining if the product was going to be safe for that piece of equipment.”
Obituary: In Memory of SMART4TB and Project ACCELERATE
March 14th 2025In this remembrance of SMART4TB and Project ACCLERATE, 2 global health initiatives, Heather Stoltzfus, MPH, RN, CIC, explains what they are and why they serve as a warning of what has been lost and what more could be lost in the future.
The Art of Wise Leadership in Infection Control and Quality Management
March 14th 2025Discover how wise leadership in infection control transforms challenges into opportunities, fosters teamwork, and safeguards patient safety through emotional intelligence, strategic vision, and inspiring action.
The CDC at a Crossroads: Budget Cuts, Public Health, and the Growing Threat of Infectious Diseases
March 12th 2025Budget cuts to the CDC threaten disease surveillance, outbreak response, and public health programs, increasing risks from measles, avian flu, and future pandemics while straining health care infrastructure nationwide.
Standing Up for Science: A Rally Participant’s Perspective
March 11th 2025Infection Control Today's Editorial Advisory Board member and contributing editor, Heather Stoltzfus, MPH, RN, CIC, recently joined the Stand Up for Science rally in Washington, DC. She gives a first-person perspective on the rally and the rally-goers' strong message.