Analyses of research finding extremely low levels of an antibacterial ingredient in waterways are distorting facts about its safety and effectiveness, according to the American Cleaning Institute (ACI).
Researchers in Minnesota published a paper that describes their finding of the ingredient triclosan in some of the states waterways. The ACI says the researchers publicity efforts promoting their paper implying safety concerns about triclosan are just not borne out by the overall body of research on triclosan. Triclosan is one of the most researched and reviewed chemicals used in healthcare and consumer products.
We would commend the researchers for being able to find vanishingly low levels of chemicals in the environment, but point out they ignore that there are no negative impacts associated with those trace compounds in the environment, says Paul DeLeo, ACI senior director of environmental safety.
The statement that We know that, since 1965, triclosan is the major source of dioxins in all these lakes, is completely misleading, according to ACI.Â
While it is true that triclosan was invented in the mid-1960s, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not issue its first proposed Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug monograph allowing for the ingredient to be used and marketed in antimicrobial washes until 1978, says DeLeo. Furthermore, soap companies did not mass market consumer antimicrobial products containing triclosan until 1989. Moreover, the FDA did not approve triclosan to be used in dentifrices until the mid to late 1990s.
Antibacterial handwash products containing triclosan are regulated in the U.S. by the FDA as OTC drug products and provide a key public health benefit by reducing or eliminating pathogenic bacteria on the skin to a significantly greater degree than plain soap and water.
Triclosan and products containing it have been scrutinized by a number of governmental bodies around the world. It has a long track record of human and environmental safety which is supported by a multitude of science-based, transparent risk analyses. Currently, FDA and Health Canada have publicly indicated that that triclosan does not harm human health. Â
Some media reports on the new research have talked about antibiotics being found in Minnesota waterways. There are no antibiotics in soaps and cosmetics. Triclosan is not an antibiotic.
We are deeply concerned about the recent proliferation of biased and inaccurate information being reported on triclosan, says DeLeo. Our overriding concern is the safety of those who use our products. Families can continue to use antibacterial soaps and hygiene products with confidence and use them in everyday situations. These products are safe, effective and they do what they say they do: kill germs that can make us sick.Â
Tackling Health Care-Associated Infections: SHEA’s Bold 10-Year Research Plan to Save Lives
December 12th 2024Discover SHEA's visionary 10-year plan to reduce HAIs by advancing infection prevention strategies, understanding transmission, and improving diagnostic practices for better patient outcomes.
Point-of-Care Engagement in Long-Term Care Decreasing Infections
November 26th 2024Get Well’s digital patient engagement platform decreases hospital-acquired infection rates by 31%, improves patient education, and fosters involvement in personalized care plans through real-time interaction tools.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.