Anthrax Spores Use RNA Coat to Mislead Immune System

Article

Researchers from Harvard Medical School have discovered that the body’s immune system initially detects the presence of anthrax spores by recognizing RNA molecules that coat the spores’ surface. But this prompts an unfavorable immune response that hinders the body’s fight against anthrax once the spores have germinated into live bacteria, according to the study “TLR sensing of bacterial spore-associated RNA triggers host immune responses with detrimental effects,” which will be published April 11 in the Journal of Experimental Medicine

Anthrax spores contain RNA (red) in their outermost layers. Courtesy of Choo et al., 2017

Researchers from Harvard Medical School have discovered that the body’s immune system initially detects the presence of anthrax spores by recognizing RNA molecules that coat the spores’ surface. But this prompts an unfavorable immune response that hinders the body’s fight against anthrax once the spores have germinated into live bacteria, according to the study “TLR sensing of bacterial spore-associated RNA triggers host immune responses with detrimental effects,” which will be published April 11 in the Journal of Experimental Medicine.

Anthrax is caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, which is equipped with several mechanisms that allow it to survive and replicate inside its host. But anthrax usually enters the body in the form of dormant spores that only later germinate into the active, replicating form of the bacterium. “It is unclear whether anthrax spores trigger host immune responses and, if so, which components of the spore activate host immune sensors,” says Jin Mo Park, an assistant professor of dermatology at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, who led the study.

Park and colleagues found that anthrax spores do, in fact, stimulate the host immune system and that they do so by activating a distinct set of immune sensors that don’t recognize the active, or vegetative, form of Bacillus anthracis. Immune cells called macrophages recognize vegetative Bacillus anthracis using a cell surface receptor protein called TLR2, which binds to lipoprotein molecules in the bacterial cell wall. Park’s team discovered that human macrophages use two different receptors­-TLR7 and TLR8-to recognize RNA molecules embedded in the outermost layer of anthrax spores.

This distinct recognition mechanism means that anthrax spores provoke a distinct immune response in macrophages. Unlike vegetative cells, anthrax spores stimulate the production of immune signaling molecules called type I interferons. Though these molecules are useful for fighting a variety of different pathogens, Park and colleagues suggest that type I interferons could reduce the immune system’s ability to neutralize Bacillus anthracis after the spores have germinated into the vegetative form of the bacterium. Type I interferons are known, for example, to disrupt the activities of two other immune signaling molecules, IL-1 and IL-17, that help protect the body from anthrax infection.

Accordingly, the researchers found that anthrax spores were more lethal to mice than the vegetative form of the bacterium, but spores lacking the outermost, RNA-containing layer that stimulates type I interferon production were much less deadly. Mice deficient in type I interferon signaling were also more resistant to anthrax spores, Park and colleagues determined.

“We postulate that Bacillus anthracis has evolved to use spore-associated RNA to activate type I interferon signaling and thereby evade host immunity,” Park explains. “Our findings suggest that spore-associated RNA triggers early host responses to anthrax infection, but that type I interferon signaling serves to misguide host immunity and impair the body’s defense against the vegetative form of the bacterium at later stages of infection.”

Source: Rockefeller University Press

Recent Videos
Mark Wiencek, PhD
Rebecca Crapanzano-Sigafoos, DrPH, CIC, AL-CIP, FAPIC
The CDC’s updated hospital respiratory reporting requirement has added new layers of responsibility for infection preventionists. Karen Jones, MPH, RN, CIC, FAPIC, clinical program manager at Wolters Kluwer, breaks down what it means and how IPs can adapt.
Studying for the CIC using a digital tablet and computer (Adobe Stock 335828989 by NIKCOA)
Infection Control Today's Conversations with the HSPA President, Arlene Bush, CRCST, CER, CIS, SME, DSMD, CRMST
Infection Control Today's Conversations with the HSPA President, Arlene Bush, CRCST, CER, CIS, SME, DSMD, CRMST
Cheron Rojo, BS, FCS, CHL,  CER, CFER, CRCST
Matthias Tschoerner, Dr Sc
Standardizing Cleaning and Disinfection
Concept images of Far-UVC  (Adobe Stock 316993517 by hopenv)
Related Content