The hospital environment poses a substantial risk for transmission of pathogens. However, assessing cleaning efficiency is difficult and often is carried out by a subjective visual check only. The ATP-bioluminescence assay technology was developed to assist in evaluation of the environmental cleaning process by counting living and non-living organic matter in Relative Light Units (RLUs). In a 1,000-bed university-affiliated hospital the standard practice following patient discharge includes terminal cleaning of the patient unit performed by nursing aides associated with the ward.
Nativ et al. (2013) sought to compare, in RLUs, the outcome of environmental and terminal cleaning in hospital wards using dedicated trained maintenance personnel (strategy 1) versus routine departmental cleaning (strategy 2). An additional purpose was to evaluate the applicability of the ATP-bioluminescence assay technology.
An experimental design with an intervention (strategy 1) and control (strategy 2) was conducted on four comparable medical wards. Two wards used cleaning strategy 1 for terminal cleaning and the other two used cleaning strategy 2 as controls. Ten sites were examined in each ward with ATP-bioluminescence assay: six sites of high risk patient contact areas 30 minutes following terminal cleaning, and 4 sites for general environmental surroundings.
Seven hundred seventy samples were collected; 373 from the intervention group wards and 397 from the control group wards. A statistically significant difference was found in 2 out of 6 high risk patient contact sites in the patient units: 1) the bed rails, with a median of 397 RLUs in the intervention group vs. 752 RLUs in the control group (p<0.001); and 2) the call button, with medians of 338 and 535 RLUs in the intervention and control group, respectively (p<0.002).
The researchers conclude that assigning a dedicated and trained team for terminal cleaning as a cleaning strategy demonstrated superiority at least in 2 out of 6 high-touch surface areas. The ATP-bioluminescence assay technology is a convenient way to check general cleanliness.
Reference: Nativ R, Riven IL and Borer A. Oral presentation O065 at 2nd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2013): Using adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP)-bioluminescence assay to compare outcomes of two strategies to perform environmental cleaning in a hospital setting. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):O65 doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O65
Disclosures: R. Nativ received grant/research support from M3 Israel and CHEMITEC; I. Livshiz Riven, none declared; A. Borer, none declared.
Show, Tell, Teach: Elevating EVS Training Through Cognitive Science and Performance Coaching
April 25th 2025Training EVS workers for hygiene excellence demands more than manuals—it requires active engagement, motor skills coaching, and teach-back techniques to reduce HAIs and improve patient outcomes.
The Rise of Disposable Products in Health Care Cleaning and Linens
April 25th 2025Health care-associated infections are driving a shift toward disposable microfiber cloths, mop pads, and curtains—offering infection prevention, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency in one-time-use solutions.
Vet IP Roundtable 2: Infection Control and Biosecurity Challenges in Veterinary Care
March 31st 2025Veterinary IPs highlight critical gaps in cleaning protocols, training, and biosecurity, stressing the urgent need for standardized, animal-specific infection prevention practices across diverse care settings.