In the relentless health care environment, mental wellness is vital, but burnout is rampant. As the pandemic exacerbates the crisis, a proactive, comprehensive strategy is essential for preventing and alleviating burnout.
In the relentless health care environment, mental wellness is vital, but burnout is rampant. As the pandemic exacerbates the crisis, a proactive, comprehensive strategy is essential for preventing and alleviating burnout.
“Get up,” my manager said. “Get up and get back out there. We need you right now.”
“I can’t do it,” I said, exhausted by the barrage of patients streaming through the doors of the emergency department.
“Yes. You can. You’re going to get back out there and fake it until you make it,” she said. “That’s what we do.”
So, I rose and returned to the nursing station to finish my shift.
I learned early on in my career that health care was not a job for the faint of heart. I would work 12 hours on my feet, sometimes nonstop, going hours before using the restroom or stopping to drink water. My motto became, “Fake it until you make it.” Although this is a motto that has successfully pushed me beyond my comfort zone a multitude of times, it is also a mindset that led me to neglect my health and ignore signs and symptoms of chronic stress that would eventually lead to burnout. I soon learned we cannot always “fake it until we make it.” We must take steps to prevent and respond to the occupational phenomenon of burnout in health care before we crash into a total state of exhaustion.
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines burnout as “a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed.” It is characterized as having 3 separate, co-existing dimensions:
Although this official definition of burnout is new as of 2019, the experience of burnout is nowhere near being a new phenomenon. In 1979, Herbert Freudenberger, PhD, a German-born US psychologist and psychotherapist, first described burnout as “becoming exhausted by making excessive demands on energy, strength, or resources in the workplace.” His astute observations of burnout in a free health care clinic suggested that prevention must occur individually and at the organizational and systems levels.
For decades, additional research and survey tools have sought to highlight the challenges of preventing and responding to burnout in the workplace. Data especially highlights the higher rates of burnout in health care, even before the pandemic. According to data from HHS, 54% of doctors and nurses were already reporting burnout before 2020.
A brief review of historical data quickly reveals that our experience of burnout is not new. However, the trajectory of burnout in the workplace in health care continues to be on the rise, made worse by the rigorous strain placed on health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. HHS further notes that since the pandemic, 66% of nurses are considering resignation. We are in the midst of a national crisis threatening our nation’s health. Without swift and targeted actions, we face a possible future without enough health care staff to safely and effectively operationalize our health care institutions.
Burnout research and interventions in health care have focused mainly on clinical staff -- doctors, nurses, and clinical support. Minimal research and interventions have been targeted toward the paramedical profession supporting those clinical teams. One supporting paramedical profession lacking data on burnout, but clearly experiencing significant challenges in the aftermath of the pandemic is the job of the infection preventionist (IP).
In a study from the American Journal of Infection Control, self-reported rates of burnout in IPs between July and August 2021 reached 65%. Additionally, IPs reported that the pandemic negatively impacted their physical and mental health. 37.4% of IPs reported increased alcohol consumption, while others reported that the pandemic had a negative impact on their sleep (77%), physical activity (64.5%), and healthy eating habits (61%).
Something must change. It’s evident that this problem is not going away by itself and will most likely continue to worsen before it gets better. We cannot “fake it until we make it” through burnout. Without quick, strategic actions, we risk losing a substantial portion of our infection prevention, clinical, and other health care-related workforces.
But what is the answer? How do we respond to this growing epidemic in our profession? Maybe the answer lies in examining our long-standing approach to preventing communicable and noncommunicable diseases, a multipronged approach developed to address a multifactorial problem.
As IPs, we’ve been strategically tackling health care-associated infections (HAIs) for decades. We’ve learned that focusing on only 1 aspect of prevention and control will not likely yield a significant decrease in HAIs.Instead, because the problem is multifactorial, we must take a multi-pronged approach to prevention, using toolkits to mount a comprehensive response. When preventing Catheter-associated urinary tract infection and central line-associated bloodstream infection, for example, we examine insertion and maintenance practices, staff knowledge levels, and adherence to basic infection prevention practices. Our response to burnout must follow a similar approach. We must address this growing concern using a multipronged, multilevel approach.
Burnout risk factors are evident at 3 levels in the workplace: individual, departmental, and organizational. Roots of burnout are found at each of these levels. An individual with poor time management skills will be more susceptible to being overwhelmed with a typical workload. If the department head is unreasonable in their expectations of their employees, their employees will be set on a path toward burnout. And if an organization does not foster a culture that prioritizes wellness, this will have a trickle-down effect on each employee. If the problem is multifactorial, then the response to preventing and alleviating the problem must be addressed at each level. For the health care workforce to heal from its current experience of burnout and prevent future burnout, we need multiple interventions implemented at each level.
Organizational Leadership
Departmental Leadership
Individual
The occupational phenomenon of burnout is not going away on its own. We can’t just fake it until we make it through this one. We need to work together from the top down to combat burnout before burnout steals the best and the brightest in our field.
Redefining Competency: A Comprehensive Framework for Infection Preventionists
December 19th 2024Explore APIC’s groundbreaking framework for defining and documenting infection preventionist competency. Christine Zirges, DNP, ACNS-BC, CIC, FAPIC, shares insights on advancing professional growth, improving patient safety, and navigating regulatory challenges.
Announcing the 2024 Infection Control Today Educator of the Year: Shahbaz Salehi, MD, MPH, MSHIA
December 17th 2024Shahbaz Salehi, MD, MPH, MSHIA, is the Infection Control Today 2024 Educator of the Year. He is celebrated for his leadership, mentorship, and transformative contributions to infection prevention education and patient safety.
Pula General Hospital Celebrates Clean Hospitals
December 16th 2024Learn how Pula General Hospital in Croatia championed infection prevention and environmental hygiene and celebrated Clean Hospitals Day to honor cleaning staff and promote advanced practices for exceptional patient care and safety.
Understanding NHSN's 2022 Rebaseline Data: Key Updates and Implications for HAI Reporting
December 13th 2024Discover how the NHSN 2022 Rebaseline initiative updates health care-associated infection metrics to align with modern health care trends, enabling improved infection prevention strategies and patient safety outcomes.