Appropriate glove use is a cornerstone of effective hand hygiene programs. Nurses knowledge regarding appropriate glove use has only rarely been studied in Belgium, so researchers from Ghent University developed a questionnaire based on the World Health Organization (WHO) glove use pyramid.
The pyramid was used as campaign material for the most recent national hand hygiene campaign in Belgium. The final questionnaire contained 36 glove use indications with four response alternatives: "no gloves indicated," "non-sterile gloves indicated," "sterile gloves indicated," and "I do not know." Demographic data such as sex, age, years of nursing experience and type of ward where respondents worked, were also collected. The questionnaire was completed during class by nurses following a Bachelor-after-Bachelors course in the spring of 2009.
The questionnaire was filled out by 100 nurses; the maximum score was 94 percent, the minimum 22 percent. The median total knowledge score (scoreTOT) was 81 percent (IQR 75-86). Some of the most striking gaps in knowledge were:
- 18 percent do not wear gloves when performing a venal puncture
- 37 percent wear gloves when providing basic hygienic care and 18 percent wear no gloves when performing genital care (as a part of hygienic care)
- 29 percent will manipulate vascular catheters without gloves, 24 percent use sterile gloves
- 58 percent prepare cytostatics with non-sterile gloves
The median scoreTOT for all acute care wards was 81 percent (IQR 78-85), respondents providing chronic or extramural care scored 75 percent (IQR 71-83). This difference was statistically significant (Mann whitney U test P<0.001).
The reearchers concluded that nurses working in acute-care wards scored significantly higher compared to nurses working in other wards when it came to identifying correct glove use.
Reference: D De Wandel, D Vogelaers and S Blot. The WHO glove use pyramid: knowledge gaps among Belgian nurses. Presentation at International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC). BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P114.
Balancing Freedom and Safety: When Public Health Mandates Are Necessary
January 9th 2025Public health mandates, such as lockdowns, masking, and vaccination, balance liberty and safety, ensuring critical protections during pandemics like COVID-19 while fostering long-term survival through science.
Avian Flu Risks in Veterinary Practice: Protecting Those on the Frontlines
January 6th 2025Veterinarians, technicians, and veterinarian infection preventionists face risks from H5N1 avian flu when handling farm animals or exposed wildlife. Learn key prevention strategies, PPE recommendations, and emerging challenges.
Understanding the True Threat: Richard Webby, PhD, on H5N1 Avian Flu and Its Human Impact
January 3rd 2025Richard Webby, PhD, the director of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre or Studies on the Ecology of Influenza in Animals and Birds, discusses the evolving dynamics of H5N1 avian flu, its variants, and the low risk to humans while emphasizing vigilance among health care professionals.
Revolutionizing Infection Prevention: How Fewer Hand Hygiene Observations Can Boost Patient Safety
December 23rd 2024Discover how reducing hand hygiene observations from 200 to 50 per unit monthly can optimize infection preventionists' time, enhance safety culture, and improve patient outcomes.
Addressing Post-COVID Challenges: The Urgent Need for Enhanced Hospital Reporting Metrics
December 18th 2024Explore why CMS must expand COVID-19, influenza, and RSV reporting to include hospital-onset infections, health care worker cases, and ER trends, driving proactive prevention and patient safety.