Standardizing disinfectant wipes across multiple facilities requires comparing active ingredients, kill claims, and dwell times.
With over 300 facilities in one health care system, how does an infection preventionist (IP) narrow down the many options for disinfectant wipes while keeping both health care workers and the medical equipment safe?
Maria Montero, MPH, MT(ASCP)SM, CIC, FAPIC, IP, Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital, researched this topic for her health care system and spoke to Infection Control Today® (ICT®) about the study for which she was lead author, “Standarizing Disinfectant Wipes Across a Hospital Setting" recently published in the American Journal of Infection Control. Montero discusses how she and her team reduced the number of types of wipes used in the facilities they studied, the future research she has planned, and what needs to be updated and corrected concerning disinfection wipes in the 11 hospitals and over 300 ambulatory sites she and her colleagues studied.
“The importance [of the study] was to make sure that clinical staff were using cleaning and disinfecting surfaces and medical equipment appropriately, correctly following the correct contact times using the appropriate disinfectant wipes,” Montero told ICT® in the exclusive interview. “When we started this, there was a mixture of different types of wipes different chemicals. It was very difficult when we asked staff, “How do you clean this piece of equipment?” for them to remember the appropriate dwell time for each wipe that they used. We found this very important to standardize our disinfectant wipes across the system. When COVID-19 came, the pandemic enforced the importance of doing this because we started having difficulty securing disinfecting wipes.”
Another key point that Montero made was the safety and efficacy of the wipes used on the various equipment in the many facilities she and her team studied. In order to find the safest and most efficient wipe, she told ICT®, “We partnered with our vendor, and we shared the top 10 pieces of equipment that we used across the system, and they did a crosswalk in [to verify the wipes were safe]."
Montero said that for some of the wipes, the equipment or wipes were so new that there was no documentation yet to verify their efficacy or safety. However, “the vendor was instrumental in helping us with determining if the product was going to be safe for that piece of equipment.”
The Key to Sterile Processing Success: Leadership Engagement and Team Collaboration
January 24th 2025Effective sterile processing leadership requires active engagement, clear communication, and a transformational approach to foster collaboration, accountability, and quality in infection prevention and surgical instrument management.
Evaluating Automated Dispensing Systems for Disinfectants in Hospitals
January 23rd 2025Hospitals rely on automated disinfectant dispensers, but a study led by Curtis Donskey, MD, found inconsistent dilution levels, with some dispensers releasing only water. Improved monitoring and design modifications are essential.
Alcohol-Based Antiseptics Show Promise for Nasal Decolonization and SSI Prevention
January 23rd 2025A meta-analysis found alcohol-based antiseptics significantly reduce Staphylococcus aureus-related surgical site infections (SSIs), demonstrating efficacy comparable to mupirocin and iodophor, supporting their expanded use in infection prevention strategies.
ASRA Pain Medicine Releases Groundbreaking Infection Control Guidelines for Pain Management
January 22nd 2025The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) released comprehensive infection control guidelines for pain procedures, emphasizing prevention, early recognition, multidisciplinary collaboration, and judicious antibiotic use to enhance patient safety and healthcare outcomes.