MARCH REFERENCES
MARCH REFERENCES
THE LEGALITIES OF INFECTION CONTROL IN OR: REDUCING THE RISK OFMALPRACTICE LAWSUITS FOR PERIOPERATIVE NURSES, BY TINA BROOKS, PAGE 16
3. Creighton H and Litt H. Legal aspects of nosocomial infection. Nurs Clinof North Am. 1980; 15:789-802.
4. Rivkind R. Legal responsibilities in infection control. APIC. 1978;6:23-25.
5. No. A95A2170, 1996 WL 97034 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 7, 1996).
6. Boston University School of Law and American Journal of Law and Medicine.Am J L and Med. 1996; 22: 135-150.
7. American Nurses Association. 1998. Standards of clinical nursing practice.Washington, DC: American Nurses Pub.
8. Regan WA. Infection control in nursing care: Legalities. Regan Rep NursLaw. 1982; 22:1.
9. Ibid.
"WOUND CARE AND POST-OPERATIVE HEALING STRATEGIES" BY KATHY DIX,PAGE 20
1. www.apic.org/resc/ppcleansterile.cfm.
01/02/02
2. www.orthopedictechreview.com/issues/junjul99/pg51.htm.
01/13/02.
"PROPER PROCESSING OF PROCEDURE TRAYS," BY NANCY CHOBIN, RN,CSPDM, PAGE 24
American Society for Healthcare Central Service Professionals. TechnicianTraining Manual. Third Edition, 2001. Chicago, Ill.
"MEDICAL DEVICE ADVERSE-EVENT REPORTING SAVES LIVES, BOOSTS RISKMANAGEMENT," BY PATRICIA A. TYDELL, BSN, MSN, MPH, PAGE 28
1. Medical Devices: Early Warning of Problems is Hampered by SevereUnderreporting. PEMD 87-4.
2. Medical Devices: FDA's Implementation of the Medical Device ReportingRegulation. PEMD 89-10
3. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.Comprehensive Accreditation Manual Hospitals. 2001.
"GETTING A GRASP ON THE SURGICAL GLOVE MARKET," BY CAROLYN L.TWOMEY, PAGE 30
1. Johns Hopkins Medical Archives. Biography of William S. Halsted, MD.Accessed at http://medicalarchives.jhmi.edu/sgml/halsted.htmlon 1-9-03.
2. Groce D. Latex allergy a decade later. Managing Infection Control. 2002;August:50-54.
3. Trape MT, Schenck P, Warren A. Latex gloves use and symptoms in healthcareworkers 1 year after implementation of a policy restricting the use of powderedgloves.
4. NIOSH ALERT - Preventing allergic reactions to natural rubber latex in theworkplace. (DHHS {NIOSH}publication No. 97-135).
5. Charous BL, Blanco C, Tarlo S, Hamilton RG, Baur X, Beezhold D, Sussman G,Yunginger JW. Natural rubber latex allergy after 12 years: Recommendations andperspectives. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2002;109:31-34.
6. Meade BJ, Weissman DN, Beezhold DH. Latex allergy: past and present.International Immunopharmacology 2. ( 2002):225-238.
7. Ibid.
8. IMS Health. Hospital Supply Index, 3rd quarter, 2002. MAT.
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.
11. Meyers KK, Beck WC. Gown-Glove Interface: A Possible Solution to theDanger Zone. Infect Control Hosp Epidem. 1995;16:488-490.
12. Ibid.
" THE BASICS OF SURGICAL MASK SELECTION," BY DIANNE RAWSON, RN,PAGE 34
1. Tunevall TG. Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: acontrolled study. World J Surg. 1991;15;383-387; discussion 387-388.
2. Lafreniere R; Bohnen JMA; ET AL Infection control in the operating room:current practices or sacred cows? J AM College Surgeons. 193(4): 407-416 2001.
3. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses. AORN 2002 Standards andRecommended Practices. 2002 revised 2001
4. ASTM F 2100-01 Standard Specification for Performance of Materials used inMedical Face Masks
5. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/isolat/isolat.htm
6. ASTM F 2100-01 Standard Specification for Performance of Materials used inMedical Face Masks
7OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard (BBPS) (29 CFR 1910.1030)
8. Roth RA. Perioperative Nursing Core Curriculum, 1995, Philadelphia: WBSaunders Company.
9. OSHA's Respiratory Protection Standard, 29 CFR 1910.139 and/or 1910.134.
"CHOICE OF REUSABLES VS. DISPOSABLES DEPENDS ON UTILIZATION, SURGICALPROCEDURE," BY KELLY M. PYREK, PAGE 36
1. AORN: Recommended practices for use and selection of barrier materials forsurgical gowns and drapes. In: Standards, Recommended Guidelines and Practices,Denver, 2000. p. 268.
2. Gruendemann BJ and Mangum SS. Infection Prevention in Surgical Settings.W.B. Saunders Co. p. 125.
3. Gruendemann BJ. Reusables vs. disposables. In: Healthcare wastemanagement: a template for action, Cary, N.C., 1999. INDA, Association of theNonwoven Fabrics Industry, pp. 24-31.
4. Ibid.
5. Ibid.
6. McCullough EA. Methods for determining the barrier efficacy of surgicalgowns. Am J Infect Control. 1993 Dec:21(6):368-74.
"A STARTLING DISCOVERY: INFECTION CONTROL AND ...CONTRACEPTION?" BY KATHY DIX, PAGE 44
1. www.plannedparenthood.org/020926_non9.html
01/21/03
2. www.who.int/inf/en/pr-2002-55.html
01/21/03
3. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/answers/2003/ans01191.html
01/20/03
Point-of-Care Engagement in Long-Term Care Decreasing Infections
November 26th 2024Get Well’s digital patient engagement platform decreases hospital-acquired infection rates by 31%, improves patient education, and fosters involvement in personalized care plans through real-time interaction tools.
Comprehensive Strategies in Wound Care: Insights From Madhavi Ponnapalli, MD
November 22nd 2024Madhavi Ponnapalli, MD, discusses effective wound care strategies, including debridement techniques, offloading modalities, appropriate dressing selection, compression therapy, and nutritional needs for optimal healing outcomes.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
