NEW YORK-Two doctors in New York states last year were accused of operating on the wrong side of a patient's brain and still a third was found guilty of performing surgery on the wrong section of a spinal cord.
Another doctor lost his license for removing the left kidney of an elderly patient who had a cancerous mass on his right kidney. A different doctor performed surgery on a healthy knee, rather than the injured one. He had made the same mistake five years earlier.
A new study from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has found that the surgeon in each of these cases is not solely to blame. Medical errors stem from a series of small, crucial mistakes of those who deal with the patient, flaws in the hospital's operating procedures, and the culture of American medicine.
Often human and systems errors combine causing problems. If an X-ray is incorrectly reversed when placed on the light box, a tumor may appear on the right lung, when in truth, it is on the left. It is both the surgeon's and the technicians responsibility to double check this information. The X-ray should also be manufactured with a large L or R to prevent this from happening.
There are two categories that lead to wrong-site surgery. Latent conditions are caused by the way a staff communicates during an operation. A set number of people should verify that a correct limb and the correct patient are being prepared for surgery.
Environmental conditions include staff shortages and subspecilization. These are more difficult to fix.
A recent study in the British Medical Journal compared the workplaces of airline pilots and surgeons. Both groups often deal with younger, less experienced people working next to them. Both groups also said they do not appreciate being second-guessed. Pilot's training was changed in the last few years to change this attitude. Airlines have encouraged teamwork and those who are inexperienced are encouraged to speak up when they see a problem.
Surgeons, on the other hand, rarely hear their intern's voices. In the study, 45% of surgeons said junior team members should not questions decisions made by senior members.
This attitude may contribute to the estimated 44,000-98,000 medical mistakes that hospitalize Americans each year.
Information from www.nytimes.com
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Back to Basics: Hospital Restores Catheter-Associated UTI Rates to Prepandemic Baseline
June 16th 2025A 758-bed quaternary medical center slashed catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) by 45% over 2 years, proving that disciplined adherence to fundamental prevention steps, not expensive add-ons, can reverse the pandemic-era spike in device-related harm.
Beyond the Surface: Tackling the Sterilization Challenges of Flexible Endoscopes
May 26th 2025Flexible endoscopes revolutionized modern medicine—but their complex design poses persistent sterilization challenges. With mounting infection risks and emerging innovations, experts are rethinking how to clean and safeguard one of health care’s most indispensable tools.