|Articles|December 6, 2015

Researchers Investigate What Helps Sustain a Multi-Component Hand Hygiene Campaign

The number of national hand hygiene campaigns has increased recently, following the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Save Lives: clean your hands” initiative (2009), which offers hospitals a multi-component hand-hygiene intervention. The number of campaigns to be evaluated remains small. Most evaluations focus on consumption of alcohol handrub (AHR) and not implementation of all campaign components. In a previously published report, the effects of the English and Welsh Clean Your Hands campaign (2004-2008) on procurement of AHR and soap, and on selected healthcare associated infections, were evaluated. Fuller et al. (2015) now report on the implementation of each campaign component: provision of bedside AHR, ward posters, patient empowerment materials, audit and feedback, and guidance to secure institutional engagement.

The setting inclided all 189 acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Wales (December 2005–June 2008). Six postal questionnaires (five voluntary, one mandatory) were distributed to infection control teams six-monthly from 6 to 36 months post roll-out. Selection and attrition bias were measured.

Response rates fell from 134 (71%) at 6 months to 82 (44%) at 30 months, rising to 167 (90%) for the final mandatory one (36 months). There was no evidence of attrition or selection bias. Hospitals reported widespread early implementation of bedside AHR and posters and a gradual rise in audit. At 36 months, 90% of respondents reported the campaign to be a top hospital priority, with implementation of AHR, posters and audit reported by 96%, 97% and 91% respectively. Patient empowerment was less successful.

The researchers say the study suggests that all campaign components, apart from patient empowerment, were widely implemented and sustained. It supports previous work suggesting that adequate piloting, strong governmental support, refreshment of campaigns, and sufficient time to engage institutions help secure sustained implementation of a campaign’s key components. The results should encourage countries wishing to launch coordinated national campaigns for hospitals to participate in the WHO’s “Save Lives” initiative, which offers hospitals a similar multi-component intervention. Their research was published in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.

Reference: Fuller C, Savage J, Cookson B, et al. National observational study to evaluate the “Clean Your Hands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2015, 4:52  doi:10.1186/s13756-015-0077-0


Related to this article

A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.
Bug of the Month
The Bug of the Month helps educate readers about existing and emerging pathogens that are clinically important in today's health care facilities. This month’s Bug of the Month isn’t quite like anything we’ve featured before. Can you solve the clues before the final reveal?
Person washing hands. (Adobe Stock 200575602 By kieferpix)
In this podcast with ICT, Danielle Updegraff, MBA, BSN, RN, discusses real-time location systems, which can give infection prevention teams greater visibility into hand hygiene, workflow, and infectious disease exposures, but sustainable improvement still depends on staff engagement, leadership, education, and culture.
Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.