Some manufacturers recommend using 1.1 mL per application of alcohol-based handrubs for effective hand disinfection; however, whether this volume is sufficient to cover both hands, as recommended by the World Health Organization, and fulfills current efficacy standards, is unknown. A study by Kampf, et al. (2013) aimed to determine hand coverage for three handrubs (two gels based on 70 percent v/v and 85 percent w/w ethanol and a foam based on 70 percent v/v ethanol) applied at various volumes.
Â
Products were tested at product volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, 2.4 mL as well as one- and two-pump dispenser pushes; the foam product was tested in addition at foam volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, and 2.4 mL. Products were supplemented with a fluorescent dye and 15 participants applied products using responsible application techniques without any specific steps but the aim of completely covering both hands. Coverage quality was determined under ultraviolet light by two blinded investigators. Efficacy of the three handrubs was determined according to ASTM E 1174-06 and ASTM E 2755-10. For each experiment, the hands of 12 participants were contaminated with Serratia marcescens and the products applied as recommended (1.1 mL for 70 percent v/v ethanol products; 2 mL for the 85 percent w/w ethanol product). Log10-reduction was calculated.
Â
The researchers found that volumes < 2 mL yielded high rates of incomplete coverage (67 percent to 87 percent) whereas volumes >= 2 mL gave lower rates (13 percent to 53 percent). Differences in coverage were significant between the five volumes tested for all handrubs (p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA) but not between the three handrubs themselves (p = 0.796). Application of 1.1 mL of 70 percent v/v ethanol rubs reduced contamination by 1.85 log10 or 1.60 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06); this failed the US FDA efficacy requirement of at least 2 log10. Application of 2 mL of the 85 percent w/w ethanol rub reduced contamination by 2.06 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06), fulfilling the FDA efficacy requirement. Similar results were obtained according to ASTM E 2755-10.
The researchers concluded that their data indicated that handrubs based on 70 percent ethanol (v/v) with a recommended volume of 1.1 mL per application do not ensure complete coverage of both hands and do not achieve current ASTM efficacy standards. Their research was published in BMC Infectious Diseases.
Reference: Kampf G, Ruselack S, Eggerstedt S, Nowak N and Bashir M. Less and less--influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection. BMC Infectious Diseases 2013, 13:472 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-472
Â
Â
Tackling Health Care-Associated Infections: SHEA’s Bold 10-Year Research Plan to Save Lives
December 12th 2024Discover SHEA's visionary 10-year plan to reduce HAIs by advancing infection prevention strategies, understanding transmission, and improving diagnostic practices for better patient outcomes.
Point-of-Care Engagement in Long-Term Care Decreasing Infections
November 26th 2024Get Well’s digital patient engagement platform decreases hospital-acquired infection rates by 31%, improves patient education, and fosters involvement in personalized care plans through real-time interaction tools.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.