Clinical gloves are routinely used in the delivery of patient care but unless integrated with the World Health Organization (WHO)'s 5 moments of hand hygiene have the potential to increase the risk of HCAI transmission. Wilson, et al. (2013) sought to examine glove use in an acute-care setting, the extent to which they are associated with a risk of cross-contamination, and factors that influence healthcare workers' decision to wear them.
Observation of the use of clinical gloves was conducted in six wards by two trained observers. Independent observations were compared for inter-rater reliability. Glove use was considered appropriate if the episode involved potential contact with blood/body fluid (BBF). Risk of cross-contamination was defined as violation of one or more of the moments of hand hygiene during the glove-use episode. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 25 HCW from audited wards to explore attitudes toward the use of gloves.
The researchers observed 164 glove use episodes over 13 hours. Glove use was appropriate in 58 percent (95/164) of episodes, but gloves were commonly used for procedures with minimal risk of exposure to BBF. In 39 percent of glove-use episodes there was a risk of cross-contamination, this was significantly more likely to occur where gloves were used inappropriately (58.4% vs 28.4%; Chi2 p <0.01). In 24 percent (39) episodes more than five objects were touched by a gloved hand before the procedure was performed. In one-third of episodes, hand hygiene was not performed after glove removal. The key themes from qualitative interviews with HCW indicated that the decision to wear gloves was influenced by multidimensional socialization and emotion. Key emotions were disgust and fear, but assumptions about patients and their preferences regards glove use, confusion about when to wear them and peer pressure, were also important influences.
The researchers concluded that glove use in acute clinical settings is associated with a significant risk of cross-contamination and needs to be more explicitly integrated into hand hygiene policy. An understanding of drivers of glove use behavior is required to design interventions to reduce their misuse and overuse.
Reference: Wilson J, Lynam S, Singleton J and Loveday H. Oral presentation O003 at 2nd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2013): The misuse of clinical gloves: risk of cross-infection and factors influencing the decision of healthcare workers to wear gloves. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):O3 doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O3
Â
Point-of-Care Engagement in Long-Term Care Decreasing Infections
November 26th 2024Get Well’s digital patient engagement platform decreases hospital-acquired infection rates by 31%, improves patient education, and fosters involvement in personalized care plans through real-time interaction tools.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
CDC HICPAC Considers New Airborne Pathogen Guidelines Amid Growing Concerns
November 18th 2024The CDC HICPAC discussed updates to airborne pathogen guidelines, emphasizing the need for masks in health care. Despite risks, the committee resisted universal masking, highlighting other mitigation strategies
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.
Breaking the Cycle: Long COVID's Impact and the Urgent Need for Preventative Measures
November 15th 2024Masking, clean air, and vaccinations are essential in combating COVID-19 and preventing long-term impacts, as evidence mounts of long COVID's significant economic, cognitive, and behavioral effects.