Gloves and gowns are common intensive care unit (ICU) fomites that are frequently contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidelines recommend use of contact precautions for healthcare personnel (HCP) when dealing with patients infected with MRSA, but the efficacy of these standards are unclear.
In a study presented at IDWeek 2019, investigators with the University of Maryland, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Harbor UCLA sought to determine which patients are more likely to transfer MRSA to HCP gloves or gowns and to identify HCP interactions more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination.
The study comprised a total of 402 MRSA-colonized patients and 3982 HCP interactions. The research team cultured HCP gloves and gowns following patient interaction but before doffing. They also sampled patients’ anterior nares, perianal area, chest, and arms to assess the association between bacterial burden and contamination.
HCP gloves and gowns were contaminated with MRSA in 14.3% and 5.9% of interactions, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 16.2% of interactions.
In terms of HCP types associated with the highest rates of contamination, occupational/physical therapists were at high risk (odds ratio [OR]: 6.96 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.51-13.79]), followed by respiratory therapists (OR: 5.34 [95% CI: 3.04-9.39]), when compared with the “other” category.
Naturally, HCP who have to physically touch patients are more at risk of contamination (OR: 2.59 [95% CI: 1.04-6.51]) when compared with HCP who touch nothing in a patient’s room. Furthermore, HCP who touched only the environment were not at risk of contamination (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 0.43, 3.00]) when compared with touching nothing.
Investigators also identified an association between increasing bacterial burden in the patient’s nares, perianal area, and chest skin and glove or gown contamination.
“Contamination of HCP gloves and gowns with MRSA occurs frequently when caring for ICU patients,” investigators concluded. “Hospitals may consider optimizing contact precautions by using less precautions for low-risk interactions and more precautions for high-risk interactions.”
The study, Considerations for a Targeted Approach to Contact Precautions for Patients with MRSA in Hospitals: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Identify High-Risk Patient Characteristics and Healthcare Personnel Interactions, will be presented in an oral abstract session on Friday, October 4, 2019, at IDWeek in Washington, DC.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
CDC HICPAC Considers New Airborne Pathogen Guidelines Amid Growing Concerns
November 18th 2024The CDC HICPAC discussed updates to airborne pathogen guidelines, emphasizing the need for masks in health care. Despite risks, the committee resisted universal masking, highlighting other mitigation strategies
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.
Breaking the Cycle: Long COVID's Impact and the Urgent Need for Preventative Measures
November 15th 2024Masking, clean air, and vaccinations are essential in combating COVID-19 and preventing long-term impacts, as evidence mounts of long COVID's significant economic, cognitive, and behavioral effects.