Frequent handwashing is standard advice for avoidance of respiratory tract infections, but the evidence for a preventive effect in a general community setting is sparse. Merk, et al. (2014) set out to quantify, in a population-based adult general population cohort, the possible protection against acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) conferred by a person's self-perceived handwashing frequency.
During the pandemic influenza season from September 2009 through May 2010, a cohort of 4,365 adult residents of Stockholm County, Sweden, reported respiratory illnesses in real-time. A questionnaire about typical contact and handwashing behavior was administered at the end of the period (response rate 70 percent).
There was no significant decrease in ARI rates among adults with increased daily handwashing frequency: Compared to 2-4 times/day, 5-9 times was associated with an adjusted ARI rate ratio (RR) of 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.33), 10-19 times with RR = 1.22 (CI 0.97-1.53), and >=20 times with RR = 1.03 (CI 0.81-1.32). A similar lack of effect was seen for influenza-like illness, and in all investigated subgroups. The researchers found no clear effect modification by contact behavior. Healthcare workers exhibited rate ratio point estimates below unity, but no dose-risk trend.
The researchers say their results suggest that increases in what adult laymen perceive as being adequate handwashing may not significantly reduce the risk of ARIs. They add that this might have implications for the design of public health campaigns in the face of threatening outbreaks of respiratory infections; however, the generalizability of the results to non-pandemic circumstances should be further explored. Their research was published in BMC Infectious Diseases.
Reference: Merk H, Kühlmann-Berenzon S, Linde A and Nyrén O. Associations of handwashing frequency with incidence of acute respiratory tract infection and influenza-like illness in adults: a population-based study in Sweden. BMC Infectious Diseases 2014, 14:509 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-509.
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.
The Latest on CLABSIs and CAUTIs: Evidence-Based Approaches for Infection Prevention
February 27th 2025Health care–associated infections like CLABSIs and CAUTIs threaten patient safety. Learn evidence-based strategies, new technologies, and prevention protocols to reduce these infections and improve outcomes.
Resilience and Innovation: The Pivotal Contributions of Black Americans to Health Care and Medicine
February 24th 2025During Black History Month, we honor the resilience and contributions of Black medical professionals in health care. Despite barriers, they have led transformative changes, advocating for equitable access and medical excellence. Recognizing their impact ensures a more inclusive health care future for all.
Glove Usage Guideline: From The Joint Commission, CDC, and World Health Organization
February 17th 2025Proper glove use is crucial in health care settings to prevent infections. Guidelines from TJC, CDC, and WHO stress correct selection, usage, and disposal to minimize health care–associated infections (HAIs) and cross-contamination risks. Infection preventionists (IPs) play a key role in educating staff, enforcing compliance, and improving patient safety through standardized glove practices.