The FDA's 21 CFR Part 820 and ISO 13485 are crucial in regulating medical device quality systems. Harmonizing these standards by 2026 will streamline compliance, improve patient access to devices, and align US regulations with global practices.
The US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) play significant roles in the production of medical devices currently on the market. One area covered by both the FDA and ISO is quality systems within the medical device industry.
The FDA sets forth requirements in 21 CFR Part 820 to uphold the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) through quality system regulation.1 ISO is an international organization that creates standards based on input from experts in different industries.2 One standard that is widely recognized throughout the medical device manufacturing industry is ISO 13485. Professionals within this industry must understand the current requirements of the FDA and ISO 13485 to have a high-functioning, well-regulated quality system.
For companies that manufacture finished medical devices, implementing the regulations required by 21 CFR Part 820 allows these facilities to be compliant with the FD&C Act. 21 CFR Part 820 sets forth CGMP (current good manufacturing practices) for the regulation of facilities that partake in the manufacture or related practices for finished medical devices that are “manufactured, imported, or offered for import in any State or Territory of the US, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.”3 This regulation takes place through a quality management system (QMS). Since a federal agency puts this regulation in place, facilities participating in the previously stated activities must comply with these requirements.
One of the main differences between the FDA and ISO is that ISO is a nongovernmental organization. ISO 13485 is an international standard that also sets forth principles managed by a QMS for facilities involved in the manufacture of medical devices. Although this means that registration for ISO 13485 certification is not currently required by law in the US, this is a highly recognized global standard.
Since this is a globally recognized standard, this certification also considers some of the regulatory requirements from the European Union (EU), such as EU-MDR (Medical Devices Regulation) and EU-IVDR (In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation).4 Although adhering to ISO 13485 in the US is currently optional for medical device manufacturers, companies that export their devices to other countries may find that registration to ISO 13485 is required.3 Within the next 2 years, the FDA has announced proposed changes to the necessity of adhering to ISO 13485 requirements.
Effective February 2, 2026, 21 CFR 820 will be amended to include ISO 13485 standards by reference.3 The FDA aims to revise its requirements in 21 CFR 820 by aligning the regulations with ISO 13485 standards in an amended Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR). This process is called a “harmonization”3 of the 2 requirements. The main takeaway from aligning the 2 is that this will provide timelier access to new finished devices with additional cost savings throughout the industry.3 In addition to cost savings, “The qualitative benefits of the rule include quicker access to newly developed medical devices for patients leading to improved quality of life of the consumers.”3 Although the benefits of this harmonization were stated, the anticipated addition of ISO 13485 to the amended QMSR has brought about some concerns from professionals within the medical device industry.
Although the management of quality systems according to FDA registration and ISO certification are similar, the 2 have some differences, including specific terminology. To address this, the FDA reviewed timely public comments regarding concerns with the alignment of the standard and the current regulation.
One general comment requested that the FDA consider adding the term “correction,” as defined in ISO 13485.3 In the ruling, the FDA agreed with this commenter that adding this term would further align the QMSR with ISO 13485. The FDA also reiterated that modifications will be implemented to allow the QMSR to be consistent throughout.3 It is important to note that there are requirements in the current 21 CFR 820 regulation not included in ISO 13485 that companies must meet to comply with the FD&C Act. This will remain true in the updated QMSR.
It is recommended that medical device professionals become familiar with the requirements of the ISO 13485 standard before their anticipated implementation within the next 2 years. Understanding the FDA’s 21 CFR 820 regulations and the current ISO 13485 standard allows companies to prepare for the QMSR transition.
Introducing new requirements to a quality management system may include some concerns. However, it is important to remember that improvement within a quality system is essential for managing the production of safe, high-quality devices.
References:
Managing Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy in HIV: Insights From Michelle S. Cespedes, MD, MS
November 20th 2024Michelle S. Cespedes, MD, MS, discusses the challenges of managing multimorbidity and polypharmacy in HIV treatment, emphasizing patient education, evolving guidelines, and real-world insights from the REPRIEVE study.
Longhorn Vaccines and Diagnostics to Showcase Breakthrough Vaccine Data at IDWeek 2024
November 19th 2024Longhorn Vaccines and Diagnostics revealed promising data on universal influenza vaccine LHNVD-110 and AMR sepsis vaccine LHNVD-303 at IDWeek 2024, addressing critical global health challenges.
Infection Intel: Revolutionizing Ultrasound Probe Disinfection With Germitec's Chronos
November 19th 2024Learn how Germitec’s Chronos uses patented UV-C technology for high-level disinfection of ultrasound probes in 90 seconds, enhancing infection control, patient safety, and environmental sustainability.
CDC HICPAC Considers New Airborne Pathogen Guidelines Amid Growing Concerns
November 18th 2024The CDC HICPAC discussed updates to airborne pathogen guidelines, emphasizing the need for masks in health care. Despite risks, the committee resisted universal masking, highlighting other mitigation strategies
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.