A new study examines how monitoring and reducing operating room traffic can significantly lower the risk of surgical site infections, enhancing patient safety and infection prevention protocols.
Beyond the doors of the operating room.
(Adobe Stock 453117994 by Georgii)
Surgical procedures are often critical to disease and condition treatment. However, alongside the benefits come the risks, notably surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs can lead to prolonged hospital stays, increased health care costs, morbidity, and, in severe cases, mortality. Understanding the factors contributing to SSIs is paramount in enhancing patient safety and reducing health care-associated infections (HAIs).
A pivotal aspect influencing SSIs is the traffic within the operating room (OR) environment. Research indicates that frequent door openings and increased OR personnel movement correlate with elevated bacterial counts and heightened infection risks. The dynamics of OR traffic, including the frequency of door openings and the number of individuals entering or exiting during procedures, play a crucial role in infection prevention strategies.
“Major guidelines for SSI prevention recommend limiting OR traffic, as it has a negative effect on OR air quality,” noted a recent study “Frequent door openings correlate with increased bacterial counts and contribute to the increasing risk of SSIs.”1
To address this concern, the study titled “Automated Traffic Monitoring of Neurosurgical Operating Room” was conducted to assess OR traffic patterns during neurosurgical procedures and explore staff perceptions regarding OR traffic.1 The study's authors used a combination of direct observation, automated monitoring, and staff interviews to comprehensively analyze OR traffic dynamics and identify potential interventions to reduce traffic and mitigate infection risks.
“Multiple studies showed that a high rate of traffic during lengthy operations represents a challenge to infection prevention and patient safety,” wrote the authors. “Understanding the reason for OR traffic is essential for implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce the number of people entering or exiting the OR. Additional details regarding reasons for OR traffic [were] gathered by direct observation and uncovered 39% of OR traffic occurred due to the need to gather supplies, instruments, equipment, or other tasks.”
Direct observations revealed that the OR door was opened numerous times during procedures, with an average of 18 door openings per hour and approximately 20 individuals entering or exiting the OR per hour. Reasons for OR traffic included supply retrieval, equipment delivery, emergencies, and staff movement for various tasks. Automated monitoring further corroborated these findings, indicating a significant association between the length of the procedure and the number of individuals entering or exiting the OR.
Staff interviews provided valuable insights into perceived reasons for OR traffic and suggested interventions to minimize traffic, such as using communication devices, optimizing supply management, and increasing staff awareness. Additionally, the study's findings highlighted the importance of staff education and regular feedback on OR traffic rates to align perceptions and promote adherence to infection prevention protocols.
Overall, the findings underscore the significance of monitoring and reducing OR traffic as a fundamental strategy in preventing SSIs and enhancing patient safety. By implementing these and other targeted interventions to minimize unnecessary traffic and streamline workflow processes, health care facilities can effectively mitigate infection risks and optimize surgical outcomes.
Reference
1. Buckner L, Lacy J, Young K, Dishman D. Decreasing Foot Traffic in the Orthopedic Operating Room: A Narrative Review of the Literature. J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e414-e423. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000833. PMID: 33871413.
Stay prepared and protected with Infection Control Today's newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection preventionists.
Reducing Hidden Risks: Why Sharps Injuries Still Go Unreported
July 18th 2025Despite being a well-known occupational hazard, sharps injuries continue to occur in health care facilities and are often underreported, underestimated, and inadequately addressed. A recent interview with sharps safety advocate Amanda Heitman, BSN, RN, CNOR, a perioperative educational consultant, reveals why change is overdue and what new tools and guidance can help.
New Study Explores Oral Vancomycin to Prevent C difficile Recurrence, But Questions Remain
July 17th 2025A new clinical trial explores the use of low-dose oral vancomycin to prevent Clostridioides difficile recurrence in high-risk patients taking antibiotics. While the data suggest a possible benefit, the findings stop short of statistical significance and raise red flags about vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), underscoring the delicate balance between prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
What Lies Beneath: Why Borescopes Are Essential for Verifying Surgical Instrument Cleanliness
July 16th 2025Despite their smooth, polished exteriors, surgical instruments often harbor dangerous contaminants deep inside their lumens. At the HSPA25 and APIC25 conferences, Cori L. Ofstead, MSPH, and her colleagues revealed why borescopes are an indispensable tool for sterile processing teams, offering the only reliable way to verify internal cleanliness and improve sterile processing effectiveness to prevent patient harm.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
Targeting Uncertainty: Why Pregnancy May Be the Best Time to Build Vaccine Confidence
July 15th 2025New national survey data reveal high uncertainty among pregnant individuals—especially first-time parents—about vaccinating their future children, underscoring the value of proactive engagement to strengthen infection prevention.