Researchers Test Implementation of WHO Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy in Critical Care Units
To determine hand hygiene compliance before and after an intervention campaign in critical care units, Mazi, et al. (2013) conducted their study in the intensive care unit (ICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), burn unit (BU) and the kidney unit of the King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital in Taif, Saudi Arabia.
 The observation using the WHO hand hygiene protocol took place in four phases with phase I, between April 24, 2010 through May 6, 2010 and phase II from May 29, 2010 and June 9, 2010. An educational intervention took place between the Phases I and II. Follow-up Phases III and IV were from Oct. 1-15, 2010 and March 15-30, 2011 respectively.
Â
The researchers found 1,975 hand hygiene opportunities comprising of 409 in Phase I, 406 in Phase II, 620 in Phase III and 540 Phase IV were observed. Compliance rate was 67 percent pre-intervention, 81 percent in phase II, declining to 59 percent and 65 percent in phases III and IV. Increased compliance in the ICU from 39 percent in Phase I to 81 percent in Phase IV (p < 0.05) was sustained throughout the study.
Highest compliance rates were recorded among nurses in all phases. The improved compliance for physicians observed in the post-intervention phase was lost in follow-up phases. Missed opportunities for hand hygiene were before patient contact, after touching patient's surrounding and before aseptic techniques. Team-work and leadership were identified as enhancing factors for compliance.
Â
The researchers conclude that the WHO hand hygiene strategy combined with health education, continuous evaluation and team approach resulted in increased compliance but this was not sustained in certain critical care areas. Their research was published in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.
Reference: Mazi W, Senok AC, Al-Kahldy S and Abdullah D. Implementation of the World Health Organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2:15 doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-15
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.
The Latest on CLABSIs and CAUTIs: Evidence-Based Approaches for Infection Prevention
February 27th 2025Health care–associated infections like CLABSIs and CAUTIs threaten patient safety. Learn evidence-based strategies, new technologies, and prevention protocols to reduce these infections and improve outcomes.
Resilience and Innovation: The Pivotal Contributions of Black Americans to Health Care and Medicine
February 24th 2025During Black History Month, we honor the resilience and contributions of Black medical professionals in health care. Despite barriers, they have led transformative changes, advocating for equitable access and medical excellence. Recognizing their impact ensures a more inclusive health care future for all.
Glove Usage Guideline: From The Joint Commission, CDC, and World Health Organization
February 17th 2025Proper glove use is crucial in health care settings to prevent infections. Guidelines from TJC, CDC, and WHO stress correct selection, usage, and disposal to minimize health care–associated infections (HAIs) and cross-contamination risks. Infection preventionists (IPs) play a key role in educating staff, enforcing compliance, and improving patient safety through standardized glove practices.
