Researchers from Radbound University at Nijmegen Medical Centre, in Nijmegen, Netherlands acknowledge that improving hand hygiene (HH) compliance is still a major challenge, and they report on a study in which they compared a literature based 'state of the art' strategy with a 'team directed' strategy, based on social influence and leadership, on their effectiveness on HH compliance.
The researchers undertook a cluster randomized trial with inpatient wards as the unit of randomization. The 'state-of-the-art' strategy (SAS) included education, reminders, feedback and targeting adequate products and facilities. The 'team-directed' strategy (TD) also contained activities based on social influence and leadership, gaining active commitment and initiative of ward management, modeling by informal leaders, and setting norms and targets within the team. Strategies were delivered during a period of six months. Measurements took place directly before and after strategy delivery and six months later. The effects were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis by comparing the post-strategy hand hygiene compliance rates with the baseline rates. Multi-level analysis was applied to compensate for the clustered nature of the data by using mixed linear modeling techniques.
The SAS showed a short-term improvement of 19.6 percent and a long term improvement of 23.7 percent. The improvement for the TD was 33.7 percent (short term) and 33.1 percent (long term). The difference between TD and SAS showed an odds ratio of 1.641 (p<0.001) in favor of the 'team directed' strategy.
Huis, et al. conclude that both the 'state-of-the-art' strategy and the 'team-directed' strategy successfully improved hand hygiene compliance, but the team-directed' strategy showed even better results. The methodology of this team-directed strategy can also be used to improve team performance on other patient safety issues. Their research was presented at the International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC) held in Geneva, Switzerland June 29-July 2, 2011.
Reference: A Huis, L Schoonhoven, R Grol, R Donders, M Hulscher and T van Achterberg. Comparing short term and sustained effects of two strategies to improve nurses adherence with hand hygiene prescriptions: a cluster randomized trial. Presentation at International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC). BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P119doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P119. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/P119
Tackling Health Care-Associated Infections: SHEA’s Bold 10-Year Research Plan to Save Lives
December 12th 2024Discover SHEA's visionary 10-year plan to reduce HAIs by advancing infection prevention strategies, understanding transmission, and improving diagnostic practices for better patient outcomes.
Point-of-Care Engagement in Long-Term Care Decreasing Infections
November 26th 2024Get Well’s digital patient engagement platform decreases hospital-acquired infection rates by 31%, improves patient education, and fosters involvement in personalized care plans through real-time interaction tools.
The Leapfrog Group and the Positive Effect on Hospital Hand Hygiene
November 21st 2024The Leapfrog Group enhances hospital safety by publicizing hand hygiene performance, improving patient safety outcomes, and significantly reducing health care-associated infections through transparent standards and monitoring initiatives.
The Importance of Hand Hygiene in Clostridioides difficile Reduction
November 18th 2024Clostridioides difficile infections burden US healthcare. Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring (EHHMS) systems remind for soap and water. This study evaluates EHHMS effectiveness by comparing C difficile cases in 10 hospitals with CMS data, linking EHHMS use to reduced cases.