Researchers from Radbound University at Nijmegen Medical Centre, in Nijmegen, Netherlands acknowledge that improving hand hygiene (HH) compliance is still a major challenge, and they report on a study in which they compared a literature based 'state of the art' strategy with a 'team directed' strategy, based on social influence and leadership, on their effectiveness on HH compliance.
The researchers undertook a cluster randomized trial with inpatient wards as the unit of randomization. The 'state-of-the-art' strategy (SAS) included education, reminders, feedback and targeting adequate products and facilities. The 'team-directed' strategy (TD) also contained activities based on social influence and leadership, gaining active commitment and initiative of ward management, modeling by informal leaders, and setting norms and targets within the team. Strategies were delivered during a period of six months. Measurements took place directly before and after strategy delivery and six months later. The effects were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis by comparing the post-strategy hand hygiene compliance rates with the baseline rates. Multi-level analysis was applied to compensate for the clustered nature of the data by using mixed linear modeling techniques.
The SAS showed a short-term improvement of 19.6 percent and a long term improvement of 23.7 percent. The improvement for the TD was 33.7 percent (short term) and 33.1 percent (long term). The difference between TD and SAS showed an odds ratio of 1.641 (p<0.001) in favor of the 'team directed' strategy.
Huis, et al. conclude that both the 'state-of-the-art' strategy and the 'team-directed' strategy successfully improved hand hygiene compliance, but the team-directed' strategy showed even better results. The methodology of this team-directed strategy can also be used to improve team performance on other patient safety issues. Their research was presented at the International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC) held in Geneva, Switzerland June 29-July 2, 2011.
Reference: A Huis, L Schoonhoven, R Grol, R Donders, M Hulscher and T van Achterberg. Comparing short term and sustained effects of two strategies to improve nurses adherence with hand hygiene prescriptions: a cluster randomized trial. Presentation at International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC). BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P119doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P119. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/P119
The Guardians of Animal Health: Who Are Veterinary Infection Preventionists?
March 21st 2025Veterinary infection control experts Leslie Kollmann, BS, AAS, CVT, CIC, Denise Waiting, LVT, and Leslie Landis, LVT, BS, discuss challenges, zoonotic disease risks, and the importance of education, collaboration, and resource development in animal care facilities.
The Latest on CLABSIs and CAUTIs: Evidence-Based Approaches for Infection Prevention
February 27th 2025Health care–associated infections like CLABSIs and CAUTIs threaten patient safety. Learn evidence-based strategies, new technologies, and prevention protocols to reduce these infections and improve outcomes.
Resilience and Innovation: The Pivotal Contributions of Black Americans to Health Care and Medicine
February 24th 2025During Black History Month, we honor the resilience and contributions of Black medical professionals in health care. Despite barriers, they have led transformative changes, advocating for equitable access and medical excellence. Recognizing their impact ensures a more inclusive health care future for all.
Glove Usage Guideline: From The Joint Commission, CDC, and World Health Organization
February 17th 2025Proper glove use is crucial in health care settings to prevent infections. Guidelines from TJC, CDC, and WHO stress correct selection, usage, and disposal to minimize health care–associated infections (HAIs) and cross-contamination risks. Infection preventionists (IPs) play a key role in educating staff, enforcing compliance, and improving patient safety through standardized glove practices.