Somali-Americans develop twice the antibody response to rubella from the current vaccine compared to Caucasians in a new Mayo Clinic study on individualized aspects of immune response. A non-Somali, African-American cohort ranked next in immune response, still significantly higher than Caucasians, and Hispanic Americans in the study were least responsive to the vaccine. The findings appear in the journal Vaccine.
Â
 This is fascinating, says Gregory Poland, MD, Mayo Clinic vaccinologist and senior author of the study. We dont know why these groups reacted so differently to the vaccine thats a subject for further studies but this new information will help us as we design the vaccines of the future. It will ultimately change how we practice medicine.
The researchers studied a sample of 1,100 healthy children and young adults in Rochester, as well as over 1,000 participants from the U.S. Naval Health Research Center in San Diego as the control group. The Navy members, aged 18 to 40, were all healthy and recently vaccinated, and represented a cross-section of ethnic groups. The study also looked at a subset of a recent immigrant population from Somalia in Rochester. The Minnesota case studies were done in cooperation with the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
Â
The researchers hypothesized that race, sex or ethnicity might contribute to differences in immune response. They found no difference in gendera surprise, says Poland, because in most studies women consistently have a better immune response to vaccines than men.
Â
The significance of the findings is that in the future we may be able to create vaccines for specific groups or even individuals based on their genomic and other characteristics, says Poland. That may mean adjusting doses for some or being able to treat larger populations with the same vaccine if the dosage is less.
Â
The research team includes first author Iana Haralambieva, MD, PhD, Hannah Salk, Nathaniel Lambert, PhD, Inna Ovsyannikova, PhD, Richard Kennedy, Ph.D., Nathaniel Warner, and V. Shane Pankratz, PhD, all of Mayo Clinic.
Â
The research was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-National Institutes of Health, and by Mayo Clinic.
 Â
Source: Mayo Clinic
Gag Order Puts Public Health at Risk, APIC Urges Immediate Action
February 4th 2025APIC warns that the HHS gag order on CDC communications endangers public health, delaying critical infection updates and weakening outbreak response amid rising tuberculosis, avian flu, Ebola, and measles threats.
Breaking Barriers: The Future of HIV Prevention and the Fight for Widespread PrEP Access
January 31st 2025Despite medical advances, HIV prevention faces roadblocks—low PrEP adoption, stigma, and accessibility issues threaten progress. Experts push for innovative, long-acting solutions to end the epidemic.
The Hidden Dangers of Hospital Ventilation: Are We Spreading Viruses Further?
January 31st 2025New research reveals hospital ventilation and air purifiers may unintentionally spread viral particles, increasing infection risks. Infection preventionists must rethink airflow strategies to protect patients and staff.